|
While a man
diagnosed with localized prostate cancer is confronted with a
variety of treatment options, new research suggests that it does
not really make much difference which one he chooses.
Cure rates
are just about equal for prostate cancer patients treated with
surgery, radiation, permanent seed implants or permanent seed
implants combined with radiation therapy, according to a new study
reported in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology·Biology·Physics.
In recent
years, radical prostatectomy, various forms of external beam radiotherapy
and brachytherapy have all been promoted as options for treating
clinical stage T1 and T2 localized prostate cancer.
In this study
of 1,973 of the patients treated at Cleveland Clinic Foundation
and 1,018 treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering at Mercy Medical
Cente, researchers reviewed the biochemical relapse-free survival
rates of the men following their therapies.
The researchers
found that the biochemical failure rates or cure rates were similar
among permanent seed implantation, high-dose external beam radiotherapy,
combined seed/external beam radiotherapy and surgery for localized
prostate cancer. Outcomes were significantly worse for patients
treated with low-dose external beam radiotherapy.
This
study represents the largest published series comparing the most
frequently used therapies for patients with clinically localized
prostate cancer, said Dr. Patrick A. Kupelian of the M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center Orlando in Orlando, FL.
The
results show that survival rates are pretty much the same for
patients treated with surgery, high-dose external beam radiation
therapy, permanent seed implants and a combination of permanent
seed implants and external beam radiation therapy. We hope that
this study will help men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer
and their families evaluate the treatment options to make the
best treatment choice for their cancer and lifestyle," Kupelian
said.
Other
Sources: International Journal of Radiation Oncology·Biology·Physics
|